Americablog did post a few nasty Hillary attacks..
http://www.americablog.com/2008/03/hilla ry-today-john-mccain-has-more.html

Oh, did you mean something else?

...that were sanctioned by his campaign in any way were that she would "say anything to win," etc.

There were a few outliers such as the charge that Hillary was a "monster" by Samantha Power, which she promtly apoloigized for profusely and was fired from the Obama campaign almost immediately over (compare that to how Geraldine Ferraro has responded to her attacks on Obama) -- and the charges of race baiting by BILL Clinton levelled by folks in a subtle way. [Which were factually correct, by the way!]

Obama and his campaign have never, ever, ever, reported to sexism against Hillary to gain votes. Not even remotely.

He did not go around claiming that "men won't vote for Hillary."

In any case, many Hillary supporters made out and out racist attacks on Obama here and elsewhere. I don't hgold Hillary directly responsible for those attacks. Especially given how they COPNTINUED even after Hillary herself has magnanimously conceded and endorsed Barack. [i.e. Michelle's alleged "whitey" video.]

The fact of the matter is: McCain is a scumbag. And he's a misogynist scmbag to boot. A sexist pig in every sense of the word, from his unceremonius dumbping of his disabled firs wife, to his derogatory treatment of his current wife, to his rampant womanizing, to his crass and offensive jokes about a teenage girl.

Proud Hillary supporting women voting for him is an offense againt feminism and basic human dececy

Yes, and some Hillary supporters think there should be a massive insurgency within the party to beat sexist ol Obama (see hillaryis44.)  There are real assholes on both sides of the isle, lets all acknowledge that.  The key difference here though is that it was MCCAIN who laughed at the comment, not just a McCain supporter.  

Yeah, OK. Barack Obama isn't not trying for unity.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/thankyo uHRC?source=feature_thankyou

At which point you'll promptly ignore all evidence to the contrary so you can keep repeating the same nonsense.  

"Likeable enough" isn't sexist.

And did some Obama supporters say stupid shit?  Yes.  But I wouldn't go making a federal case of it, because there are off the rails supporters on BOTH sides of the (recently ended, in case you didn't notice) battle.  

Need proof?  May I suggest a trip over to hillaryis44.com or noquarter.com?

"To this day, Axelrod still bad mouths her daily..."

He does?
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ne d=&q=axelrod+clinton&ie=UTF-8&am p;scoring=n&sa=N&start=20

Hrm, not seeing much here.

If that's joining in, then you would have to turn around your prior comments regarding HRC never taking part (he's not a muslim that I know of)...not really much difference between your point and mine then, is there?

A search for "Axelrod Hillary" on Google news finds exactly one reference in the past week, a 6/9/08 Fox News article about how the Obama campaign is planning to utilize both Clintons in the general election.  The article is complimentary, unless you consider Axelrod's assertion that the process was "unbelievably grueling" and that Hillary "deserves some time to chill out" to be badmouthing or sliming or both.  "Axelrod and Hillary" returns the same results.  "Axelrod and Hillary"'s most recent result is May 25, 2008.  

Do you have any actual evidence that your claim---that David Axelrod personally badmouths Hillary Clinton on a daily basis---is occurring?  Because I have not seen anything like that, and a review of the public record (I don't have a lexis subscription) does not provide any support for your assertion.  

You are actually comparing the "you;re likeable anough, Hillary" comment to John McCain giggling when a supporter called Hillary a "bitch?"

Or to McCain telling Chelsea Clinton "ugly" jokes?

The is the most idiotic moral equivalency nonsense I have ever seen.

Which attacks on HRC were sexist? By whom were these attacks made? What was Obama's obligation to defend someone who was--at the time--his opponent?

<blockquotes>
To this day, Axelrod still bad mouths her daily, and they're still sliming her
</blockquotes>

And this happens, daily, in your dreams? Or do you have anything to substantiate your fantasy smears?

No, the Clintons "tarred" themselves by sending surrogates to "go there".  They shouldn't have done it.

Lots of people outside the Obama campaign thought the Clintons went over the racial line. "Hard working Americans, white Americans." How was THAT not race-baiting? Obama didn't say it. Obama didn't turn an obscure innocent reference to a racial one. He didn't need to. It was patently obvious that Hillary Clinton had equated "white" with "hard-working," which is a classic race-baiting tactic. It was her own doing, not Obama's. Yes, JJJ was snide with her re: Katrina. But JJJ's Katrina "tears" comment mostly made Jackson look like an idiot, not Clinton.

You've present a reasonable argument, so I'll offer a serious response. There's a chasm separating your perspective from mine, and this is it:

Obama tarred both Clinton's with false charges of race-bating.

From the view of just this supporter, there sure as hell was race baiting. It was not a false charge.  

Prior to Ferraro's verbal diarrhea, Obama was just a freshman senator with popular appeal running for president. Ferraro was the opening salvo in a series of shameless attempts to change that perception to him being "the black guy". Her spittle-flecked diatribes claiming that he was only winning "because he was black" was a disgusting, slanderous insult to his many supporters for whom race was farthest from their minds. Ed Rendell openly pondered whether his electorate would vote for a black man. And Bill certainly didn't help when he explained Obama's SC strength by allusions to Jesse Jackson's failed campaign.

Now, not for a second do I consider either Clinton to be racists. But I'm just as certain that Penn et al. had no qualms about using race to the campaign's advantage in Appalachia - a strategy that was clearly successful. The dog-whistle politics practiced in Appalachia weren't examples of overt racism - but the emphasis on race appealed to those they were designed to appeal to. It was a new low in a battle that had already hit epic lows.

In the end, one campaign practiced race-baiting, the other called them on it. Whether this move was "career-ending" depends on how well they now work together to smoothen ruffled feathers on both sides.

Or Bill for that matter. They accused them of race baiting. i.e. using OTHER PEOPLE'S racism to seek political advantage.

There is absolutely no doubt they did that.

Deny it if you wish. But it will just demonstrate to us how tone deaf and full of Hillary Kool Aid you are.